2018GRE作文ARGUMENT官方题库满分范文点评:Acme Publishing Company...

来源:zhan  责任编辑:小易  
摘要:GRE作文虽然有官方题库,但题目总数太多让考生难以做到全部练一遍,因此看完题目直接看对应的高分范文学习写法思路就成为了更有效率的做法。本文将为大家提供ARGUMENT题库高频作文题目的满分范文赏析:Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees...

GRE作文考试最大的特点,便是GRE题库的公开,所有GRE考试中可能会出现的作文题目,都已经事先公布在ETS的GRE官网上。尽管考题公开透明,但庞大的题量,对于想要做好充分准备的考生来说,仍然算得上是巨大的挑战。为了方便广大考生准备GRE作文,学路网为大家整理了针对题库中ARGUMENT类文章题目的满分范文,包含详细的逐段讲解和满分要素剖析,相信能给大家提供一些帮助。

2018GRE作文ARGUMENT官方题库满分范文点评:Acme Publishing Company...图1

2018GRE作文官方题库ARGUMENT题目:

The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company:

"Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One graduate of the course was able to read a five-hundred-page report in only two hours. Another graduate rose from an assistant manager to vice president of the company in under a year. Obviously, the faster you can read, the more information you can absorb in a single workday. Moreover, Easy Read costs only $500 per employee, a small price to pay when you consider the benefit. Included in this fee is a three-week seminar in Spruce City and a lifelong subscription to the Easy Read newsletter. Clearly, Acme would benefit by requiring all of our employees to take the Easy Read course."

满分范文赏析

In this argument, the personnel director of Acme Publishing claims that Acme would stand to gain from improved employee productivity. The improvement would come at the cost of $500 per employee for the enrollment in Easy-Read’s 3-week seminar. To support this claim the director points out that many other companies have claimed to benefit from the seminar, that one student was able to read a long report very quickly, and that another student saw his career advance significantly during the year after the seminar. Scrutiny reveals that it accomplishes little toward supporting the director"s claim.

【此段结构】

本段采用了标准的Argument开头段结构,即:C – E - F的开头结构,首句概括原文的C(Conclusion)。接下来的一句话概括了原文为了支持他的结论所引用的E(Evidence)。最后尾句中给出开头段到正文段的过渡句,指出原文在逻辑上存在F(Flaw)。

【此段功能】

本段作为Argument开头段,具体功能就在发起攻击。首先,概括原文的结论: Acme的personnel director认为接下来分别列举了原文为了支持这个结论引用的证据:对小城镇Leeville和大城市Mason City的对比,论据的归纳用于铺垫出正文段的具体攻击。最后点出原文存在逻辑错误,引出后面的分析。

First of all, just because other companies benefited greatly from the course does not necessarily mean that Acme will benefit in identical ways. Perhaps the type of reading on which the course focuses is not the type in which Acme Publishing employees often engage in at work. Moreover, since Acme is a publishing company its employees are likely to be excellent readers already and may not have the capacity for much more improvement. In this case, the overall improvements would be far less dramatic and if follows that the productive rate would also be a little underwhelming.

【此段结构】

本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构,即:概括第一个逻辑错误的错误类型和原文犯错位置,接下来给出合理的理由和他因来反驳原文。

【此段功能】

本段作为正文第一段,攻击文章犯的主要逻辑错误:错误类比。作者认为“Acme可能不会像其他公司一样从课程中受益”。为此,作者提出了两种可能性反驳原文:一是课程针对的阅读可能与Acme工作中的type不同;二是Acme的员工应该已经是excellent reader,课程对他们的阅读帮助不大。

Secondly, two success stories are not statistically meaningful. How many companies used the service and found no improvement? Consider the case of the individual whose career advanced after taking the course—any one of a myriad of other factors might explain that advancement.

【此段结构】

本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构,即:概括第二个逻辑错误的错误类型和原文犯错位置,接下来给出合理的理由和他因来反驳原文。

【此段功能】

本段作为正文第二段,攻击文章犯的主要逻辑错误:调查类错误。作者认为原文中提到的“两家公司成功的经历”不能说明问题。该调查没有充足的样本,同时也没有说明成功公司和失败公司的比例,而且成功案例也不能排除其他因素的影响。

Thirdly, the director assumes without warrant that the benefits of the course will outweigh its costs. While all of Acme"s employees take the 3-week course, Acme"s productivity would decline. This decline, along with the substantial fee for the course, could conceivably outweigh the course"s long-terms benefits. Without a complete cost-benefit analysis it doesn’t make sense to draw a conclusion.

【此段结构】

本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构,即:概括第三个逻辑错误的错误类型和原文犯错位置,接下来给出合理的理由和他因来反驳原文。

【此段功能】

本段作为正文第三段,攻击文章犯的主要逻辑错误:profit类。作者认为原文不能保证课程的benefits outweigh its costs。接下来。作者列举了课程会带来利润下降的一些原因,包括productivity would decline(员工上课期间生产力下降),substantial fee for the course(课程的巨额支出)。最后说明没有cost-benefit analysis,结论不合理。

  • 本文相关:
  • 2018年GRE考试真题回忆答案解析
  • GRE作文有官方题库题目全公开?不掌握用法知道考题也白搭
  • 【作文分析】GRE写作Argument高分范文用法真题实例...
  • 写好4分GRE作文只要1周?名师指点黄金写作模板使用心得
  • GRE写作Argument开头如何写好?6篇官方范文开头写...
  • 2018GRE作文ARGUMENT官方题库满分范文点评:C...
  • GRE作文题库全练一遍就能拿6分?合理运用官方资源才是真正...
  • 资深GRE写作老师有话说这些作文利器用不好就伤着自己
  • 本站网站首页首页教育资格全部考试考试首页首页考试首页职业资格考试最近更新儿童教育综合综合文库22文库2建筑专业资料考试首页范文大全公务员考试首页英语首页首页教案模拟考考试pclist学路首页日记语文古诗赏析教育教育资讯1高考资讯教育头条幼教育儿知识库教育职场育儿留学教育高考公务员考研考试教育资讯1问答教育索引资讯综合学习网站地图学习考试学习方法首页14托福知道备考心经冲刺宝典机经真题名师点睛托福课程雅思GREGMATSAT留学首页首页作文
    免责声明 - 关于我们 - 联系我们 - 广告联系 - 友情链接 - 帮助中心 - 频道导航
    Copyright © 2018 www.xue63.com All Rights Reserved